JPST vs. NEAR vs. MINT

JPST, NEAR, and MINT are three very popular and similar actively managed short maturity bond ETFs designed for current income. I compare them here.

Disclosure: Some of the links on this page are referral links. At no additional cost to you, if you choose to make a purchase or sign up for a service after clicking through those links, I may receive a small commission. This allows me to continue producing high-quality, ad-free content on this site and pays for the occasional cup of coffee. I have first-hand experience with every product or service I recommend, and I recommend them because I genuinely believe they are useful, not because of the commission I get if you decide to purchase through my links. Read more here.

JPST vs. NEAR vs. MINT – Methodologies, Yields, and Fees

JPST is the JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF. It launched in 2017 and has since become the most popular actively managed ETF in the world with nearly $25 billion in assets. JPST has about 600 holdings.

NEAR is the BlackRock Short Maturity Bond ETF. It launched in 2013 and has about $4 billion in assets. NEAR has 362 holdings.

MINT is the PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF. It launched in 2009 and has about $9 billion in assets. Like JPST, MINT has roughly 600 holdings.

Their sector compositions differ, but all three of these funds do more or less the same thing, with varying degrees of success. They all aim to provide low volatility and current income by actively selecting a diversified basket of short-term investment-grade debt instruments from around the world, such as corporate bonds, US Treasury notes, agency-backed securities, mortgage-related debt, and amuse.

At the time of writing, the 30-day SEC Yields of JPST, NEAR, and MINT are all very close at 4.51%, 4.56%, and 4.64% respectively, with respective expense ratios of 0.18%, 0.25%, and 0.36%.

JPST vs. NEAR vs. MINT – Performance

Performance is obviously what most people are concerned with in this context. Here’s how JPST, NEAR, and MINT have fared compared to cash (T-bills) since JPST’s inception in 2017 and looking through 2022:

jpst vs near vs mint performance
Source: PortfolioVisualizer.com

Notice how JPST has beaten the other two on basically every metric – higher general and risk-adjusted returns and the lowest volatility and smallest max drawdown.

Conclusion

This one seems pretty cut and dry. Even though the timeline is relatively short, JPST has proven its ability and has smoked its competitors. Thus, it makes sense that it has become the most popular actively managed fund in the world even though it’s the youngest of these three.

Conveniently, it also happens to be the cheapest on the list with a fee of 0.18%.

JPST should be available at any major broker, including M1 Financewhich is the one I’m usually suggesting around here.

What do you think of these three funds? Do you own any of them? Let me know in the comments.


Disclosure: None.

Disclaimer: While I love diving into investing-related data and playing around with backtests, I am in no way a certified expert. I have no formal financial education. I am not a financial advisor, portfolio manager, or accountant. This is not financial advice, investing advice, or tax advice. The information on this website is for informational and recreational purposes only. Investment products discussed (ETFs, mutual funds, etc.) are for illustrative purposes only. It is not a recommendation to buy, sell, or otherwise transact in any of the products mentioned. Do your own due diligence. Past performance does not guarantee future returns. Read my longer disclaimer here.

m1 finance get started

Leave a Comment